Ｎo -ism is good
|I don’t find any extreme
better than other extremes, no matter it is individuality, capitalism,
nationalism, socialism, whatever.For example:
In fact the word "capitalism" in itself is not
balanced, the phrase should be like a balanced influence of capital is
acceptable. In fighting the feudalism, capitalism is a leading factor, but
the victims of feudalism was not restricted to capital owners, so the
success can not be attributed only to capitalism. Owning capital means the
lord of something, it enlightens the people’s mind of self-fulfillment,
of their own life values.
Why should people believe something extreme in order to distinguish themselves? Extreme doctrines plus extreme attitude will be disastrous. When people start to hold on to something extreme they attack those who don't believe the same thing. Others and morality become dispendable in their eyes. The faith become unscrutinizable by objective observers, the list of badness can go on and on.
Calling this anti-ism-ism is not a precise presentation of the case. I
do not oppose some isms completely, or I should say to take some positive factors of some isms on appropriate occasions. So no-ism is not any kind of ism in the common sense. It is synthetical not
analytical and dose not belongs to the same conceptual set of isms.
首页/Home 文心目录/Article Categories